In the US – superwealthy H fights superwealthy T to take job of president of a country that superwealthy O has left. Over a bilion spent on the election. Superwealthy H doesn’t find that the superwealthy fight goes their way so spends over a year telling any kind of story to anyone and everyone about why it happened. Now superwealthy owner of tech company F decides that some of the superwealth might not always be coming their way in the future so join in the ‘Russian’ whispers. Superwealthy owners of tech company G decide to do the same. Is anyone better off e.g. the 99%? are we pretending that US state & private intelligence services don’t do that thing that they do.
Meanwhile in the UK with a referendum, superwealthy Ts have a superwealthy fight about power and how superwealth from some pockets can be moved into other superwealthy pockets at the expense of the 99% and tell any kind of story to anyone and everyone about why it happened. Guess who also got blamed. Are we pretending that UK state and private intelligence services don’t do that thing that they do?
Some of the other superwealthy tech people are now also crocodile tearing their way across the media owned by the superwealthy. That probably means more trees destroyed for sob stories of superwealthy powerful people not getting all the superwealth & power they crave all of the time.